People v. Heck
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment following a jury trial convicting him of three counts of endangering the welfare of a child. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a mistrial (see, People v Ortiz, 54 NY2d 288, 292). The court’s curative instruction sufficiently eliminated any prejudice that defendant may have suffered from the brief testimony concerning his uncharged criminal activity (see, People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865; see also, People v Brooks, 213 AD2d 999, lv denied 85 NY2d 970; see generally, People v…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. SantiagoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SchrooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. WatersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. LatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.