Legal Opinion

G.J.B. & Associates, Inc. v. Singleton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1990No. 88-2249PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Movant-appellant John Claro, an attorney, challenges the district court’s sua sponte imposition of sanctions upon him for violating Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 & 16(f) during trial of a legal malpractice action. Reviewing the district court’s determination under an abuse of discretion standard, Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 2447, 2461, 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990) (Rule 11 standard); Ikerd v. Lacy, 852 F.2d 1256, 1258 (10th Cir.1988) (Rule 16(f) standard), we sustain the Rule 16(f) sanction as lawfully imposed, but vacate the Rule 11 sanction for want of procedural…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Richard J. Angelico, M.D. v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Chaves v. M/V Medina StarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Couveau v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API