Condee v. Gyger
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Biverside County granting a new trial. J. S. Noyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial. The motion was upon the grounds of newly-discovered evidence and the other statutory grounds. At the hearing the court made the following minute order: “The motion heretofore made for a new trial .of this cause is this day granted by the court.”
Appellant contends that as the court assigns no reason for its order, and as the court must have given careful consideration to all the facts at the trial, the motion presumably was granted alone on the affidavits showing newly-discovered evidence. No…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Hass v. Mutual Relief Ass'n of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by29 opinions
- Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- McEwen v. Occidental Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.