Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gladstone

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 11, 1999No. Civil Action 93-11255-NGPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) submits two Motions to Dismiss Affirmative Defenses: one a Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses Which Are Not Based upon the Conduct of Federal Regulatory Agencies (docket #304), and one a Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses Which Are Based upon the Conduct of Federal Regulatory Agencies (docket # 306).

Specifically, in its Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses Which Are Based on the Conduct of Federal Regulatory Agencies, the FDIC moves to strike the following affirmative defenses of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  2. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. NothernDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MahajanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OrnsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API