Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Ornstein
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 1, 1999No. 9:93-cv-05514PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLEESON, District Judge.
In December of 1993, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) commenced the instant action, seeking to hold Central Federal Savings Bank’s (“CFS”) directors and officers hable for numerous alleged acts of malfeasance committed by the bank. The only remaining defendants, George Kaminow and Michael Griffith, have asserted a number of affirmative defenses to the claims against them. The FDIC has moved in limine to strike some of these defenses and for an order precluding defendants from introducing any evidence in support of them.
For the reasons…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Coach, Inc. v. Kmart CorporationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MahajanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Arrillaga-TorrénsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- New York v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.