Kahn v. Weinlander
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from tlie Circuit Court for Escambia county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the ■court.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabry, J.:
In the first of the above styled cases M. Weinlander ■ and others, appellees, alleged in a bill against Jacob Kahn and Carolina, his wife, appellants, that appellees had obtained judgments,* some in 1886 and some in 1888 and 1889. against Jacob* Kahn, and that nulla bona returns on executions issued thereon had been made by the sheriff. That Jacob Kahn purchased in January, 1887, arpent lots 32 and 33, in the old city ■ of Pensacola, for the sum of $4,000, but being at the -time insolvent, and desirous of defrauding his cred*212itors, caused the deed for said lots to be made to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clements v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Seitz v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Conley v. NailorSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Burt v. TimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Robinson v. Springfield Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Farrell v. Forest Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Parken v. SaffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Worley v. Dade County Security Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Hummell v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.