Legal Opinion

Impounded

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 20, 2001No. 00-5186PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

In this grand jury proceeding, the issue on appeal is whether, on the facts presented, the crime-fraud exception overrides the attorney-client privilege. In the proceedings below, the District Court declined to enforce a grand jury subpoena issued to an attorney. Citing the crime-fraud exception, the government has appealed.1

I

Over four years ago in April 1996, a federal grand jury commenced investigating the target’s business transactions and issued several subpoenas to the target’s affiliated businesses. The target’s attorney assumed responsibility…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Supreme Court of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re: Grand Jury v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API