Legal Opinion

United States v. Leroy Mack

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2015No. 14-10192Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Leroy Roosevelt Mack (“Mack”) appeals the length of his supervised release after a revocation of supervised release, as well as a condition placed on his supervised release. Because Mack did not object to either the length or the condition at sentencing, we review for plain error. United States v. Chhun, 744 F.3d 1110, 1123 (9th Cir.2014). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Mack argues that the district court did not adequately explain the reason for its chosen sentence. The district court imposed an additional length of supervised release after revocation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Sabil M. Mujahid v. Charles A. Daniels, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Nicholas Vasquez-PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API