Legal Opinion
United States v. Grant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2011No. 10-10245PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Senior Circuit Judge:
We address whether rehabilitation can be considered for purposes of imposing imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release.
I. Facts.
Leon W. Grant’s offense of conviction was fraud on two banks. By various means, he sought to enrich himself at the banks’ expense with counterfeit checks. He was sentenced in 2004 to one day of prison on each count and five years of supervised release, plus $38,598.44 in restitution (he had attempted to obtain about half this amount, his partner about the same). Grant’s supervised release sentence included mandatory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. AuteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Daniel W. DuranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. MolignaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Walter Henry Vandergrift, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MendiolaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jesus GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael DeenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.