Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, appellant Judicial Watch obtained two court orders directing the government to release by specified dates videotapes relevant to the tragic events of September 11, 2001. After receiving the tapes, Judicial Watch moved for attorneys’ fees. The government argued, and the district court agreed, that the organization was ineligible for an award of fees because it had failed to “substantially prevail[]” as FOIA requires. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E). Because we have thrice held that court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States Department of State v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Tax Analysts v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Loving v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Davis v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Grand Canyon Trust v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.