Legal Opinion

Pacitto v. Prignano

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 2017No. Court of Appeals No. 16CA0590Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE RICHMAN

¶ 1 Defendants Charles M. and Frances P. Prignano appeal the district court's confirmation of an arbitration award and denial of their motion to vacate that award. We affirm the judgment and remand for a calculation and award of appellate attorney fees and costs to plaintiff Michele Pacitto, Jr.

I. Background

¶ 2 The Prignanos asserted multiple claims against Pacitto, a registered representative, in a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) securities industry arbitration. Pacitto raised several counterclaims. The arbitration panel denied the Prignanos' claims,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 969 v. Babcock & Wilcox, D/B/A B & W Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
Move, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
Kutch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.