Legal Opinion
United States Rubber Co. v. Consolidated Trimming Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 13, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
This is an action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), alleging infringement of two patents covering carpet-seaming tapes. The first of these patents was issued to Walter J. Reinhard, a plaintiff in this action. The other plaintiff, United States Rubber Company (“U.S. Rubber”), acquired the rights to the second patent by assignment from the alleged inventor, Paul D. Wright. Defendant is Consolidated Trimming Corporation (“Consolidated”), a New York corporation, having its principal place of business in Manhattan. The litigation has spawned a number of legal and factual issues.1…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Dean A. Lyon v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Western States MacH. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Courtland v. Walston & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Leighton v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD CO.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969