Legal Opinion

Jazz Photo Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 16, 2007No. Slip Op. 07-109; Court 04-00494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANCEU, Judge.

Before the court is the application of Jazz Photo Corporation (“Jazz” or “plaintiff’) for attorneys’ fees and other expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (2000). The court conditionally grants the application in part because the positions that the United States (“defendant”) took before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on two of the issues in the litigation — the issue of permissible repair and the issue of segregation of merchandise — were not substantially justified.

I. BACKGROUND

The subject EAJA…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  2. Jazz Photo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. Keirton USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
  4. Shinyei Corp. of Am. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
  5. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API