Legal Opinion
Rafala v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 5, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
The defendant zoning board of appeals granted the application of the defendant Pulito for a permit to use premises located at 492 Front Street in Hartford for the purpose of a package store for the sale of alcoholic liquors, at variance with a provision of the zoning ordinance requiring an interval of 1500 feet between such outlets. The plaintiff, a neighboring property owner, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas, it sustained the appeal, and Pulito has appealed to this court.
A transcript of the hearing before the board was certified to the trial court, and no additional evidence was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Biz v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Nielsen v. Board of Appeals on ZoningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Stavola v. BulkeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Delaney v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fiorilla v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Mitchell Land Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Libby v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Farr v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Celentano v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.