Legal Opinion
Marlo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 19, 2008No. CV 03-04336 DDP (RZx)PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DECERTIFYING THE CLASS
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Court’s Order Setting a Decertification Hearing. (Order Setting Decertification Hearing, April 1, 2008.) Michael Mario (“Plaintiff’) filed this action, on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated individuals (“the class”), against United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) for violations of California state law wage-and-hour law. A class was certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on June 10, 2004. After meeting with the parties on several occasions, reviewing the many…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Marlo v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Arredondo v. Delano Farms Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Soderstedt v. CBIZ Southern California, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Taylor v. United Parcel Service Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Kamar v. Radio Shack Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.