Legal Opinion

New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. Riegger

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2006No. 25,610PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Judge.

{1} We affirm the district court, holding that the Board of Veterinary Medicine (the Board) cannot sanction its licensees for acts of ordinary negligence arising out of a single episode of care under NMSA 1978, § 61-14-13(A)(5) (1999). We reverse the district court’s disallowances of the costs of this administrative action. We hold that NMSA 1978, § 61-1-4(G) (2003), which states that licensees must generally bear all costs of the disciplinary proceedings against them, is not limited by the terms of Rule 1-054(D) NMRA and that the legislature did not intend for Rule…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. RieggerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. RieggerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API