State v. Grubstake Investment Ass'n
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood
The State of Texas, by the Attorney-General, sued the Grubstake Investment Company and others to recover the title to, and possession of, a portion of the bed of the Frio River in the Counties of McMullen and Live Oak. A. J. Coyle and the Coyle-Concord Oil Company, as holders of the State’s permit to prospect for oil and gas in- the portion of the river bed sued for, adopted the State’s pleadings, becoming co-plaintiffs in the suit. The defendants pleaded a general denial and “not guilty,” besides asking special relief.
The facts disclosed, without dispute, that the co-plaintiffs of the State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Mayor of Galveston v. MenardTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Massachusetts v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Phillips v. AyresTexas Supreme Court · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Luttes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Manry v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Diversion Lake Club v. HeathTexas Supreme Court · 1935
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.