Legal Opinion

Schlaich v. Blum

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 17, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Louis Schlaich against Nathan B. Blum and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is an appeal from a final order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor of the occupants, the respondents, in summary proceedings to recover possession of *336real property. The proceedings were instituted by the petitioner, Schlaich, as agent of the owners of the property, under and by virtue of section 2231, subd. 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure. The respondents, Blum and Levy, are subtenants. The material facts established by the evidence are as follows: In November, 1900, Mary W. Hamilton, owning a life estate in the premises 455 and 457 Broadway, in the city of New…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Croft v. KingNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879
  2. Kelly v. VarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Rodgers v. EarleThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  4. Hausauer v. DahlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Fox v. HeldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belding Bros. & Co. v. BlumAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API