Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Kilbride & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.
This proceeding by claimant for the purpose of recovering damages as the ru suit of an alleged accident *642was brought under the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation Law (Insurance Law, art. 17-A).
The move for arbitration in the proceeding was thereafter stayed by an Associate Judge, and instead, a hearing was directed in order to determine whether or not claimant’s alleged claim for reparable injuries could be made amenable to arbitration within the compass of the text of the forequoted article 17-A.
The hearing, held before me, has thrown into focus the following salient…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Golembe v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Brown v. Chaminade Velours, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1941
- Brown v. Chaminade Velours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & JermanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AmatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Bendik v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1972