Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Amato
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 29, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Mangano, J. P.
The question to be resolved on the instant appeal is whether the City of New York (hereinafter the city) is obligated, as an unregulated self-insurer, to provide uninsured motorist coverage to two of its policemen who were injured when the New York City police vehicles in which they were riding were struck by uninsured motor vehicles. In our view, this question must be answered in the affirmative.
PROCEEDING NO. 1
The respondent Anthony Amato, a New York City police officer, was injured on April 26, 1982, when the police scooter in which he was riding was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between Durant & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & ManningNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re the Arbitration Between New York City Transit Authority & ThomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Durant v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Interboro Mutual Insurance v. DevoneNew York Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Patrick FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- Sentry Insurance Co. v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987