Legal Opinion

Appeal of New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 2, 2005No. 2004-302PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.

The petitioner, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation (DOT), appeals a decision of the appeals board (board), see RSA 21-L:14 (2000), requiring that a driveway permit be granted to the respondent, David C. Dobbins. The permit would allow direct access to a State highway pursuant to an exception to the so-called three driveway rule promulgated by the DOT. The respondent filed a cross-appeal contesting the validity of the three driveway rule. We conclude that the three driveway rule is a valid exercise of the DOT’s administrative rulemaking authority and reverse the board’s decision.

I

Th…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferretti v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  2. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. State v. NormandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  5. New Hampshire Retirement System v. SununuSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Alexis O.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Appeal of Omega Entertainment, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Vector Marketing Corp. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Appeal of MaysSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. In re Juvenile 2004-789-ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API