Legal Opinion
Adamson v. Pierce County
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided June 30, 2023No. 3:21-cv-05592Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 CHRIS ADAMSON, et al., CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05592-BHS 11 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 12 PIERCE COUNTY, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel.1 Dkt. 62. Having 16 considered the parties’ briefing and relevant record, the Motion (Dkt. 62) is GRANTED in part 17 and DENIED in part for reasons explained herein. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 The parties are familiar with the claims and allegations underlying this case, and the 20 Court summarizes them…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.