Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Quinlivan v. Quinlivan

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1984No. C1-84-1070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Dolores Quinlivan petitioned for dissolution of her marriage to Keith Quinlivan. On May 7, 1984, after a two day trial, the court entered judgment distributing the assets of the parties. Dolores’s motion for amended findings was denied and she appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

Dolores and Keith (“appellant” and “respondent”) were married in October of 1971. Appellant had children from a previ ous marriage who lived with the parties during the marriage. Appellant’s children received social security benefits, on behalf of their deceased father, during a portion of the marriage.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Marriage of Janssen v. JanssenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Faus v. FausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Marriage of Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Marriage of Otte v. OtteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Andersen v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Nelson v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API