Consolidated Home Supply Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. Town of Berthoud
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
The Town of Berthoud (Berthoud) filed an application in the water court to change the *262use of two of its water rights on the Big Thompson River, one in the amount of 8.0 cubic feet per second (e.f.s.) and the other in the amount of 4.14 e.f.s. Berthoud has historically diverted these rights through the Handy Ditch during irrigation months. In its application, Berthoud sought to obtain authorization to divert the rights through the Colorado Big Thompson Project Facilities on a year-round basis.
The water court held a four-day trial on Berthoud’s change of use application during which two of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- City of Westminster v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Manor Vail Condominium Ass'n v. Town of VailSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Banner Advertising, Inc. v. People of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Knapp v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Haystack Ranch, LLC v. FazzioSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jordan v. Maxim Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Hines Highlands Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.