Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice ROBERT J. SEERDEN.
This is a products liability and negligence case tried before a jury. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (“PCC”), appellant, appeals the adverse judgment for damages under the Texas Wrongful Death and Survival Statute.
In seven issues, PCC asserts that: (1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this suit because Cecile Walters lacked standing to bring this claim in Texas under the Texas survival statutes; (2) the trial court erroneously applied Texas substantive law to this case; (3) the trial court erroneously admitted harmful…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Johnson v. Structured Asset Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- Fraud-Tech, Inc. v. Choicepoint, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Charles Brown, L.L.P. v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
- Duran v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.