Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Daman Trailer Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 10, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The issue to be decided is whether the trial court erred in setting aside the entry *422of default and default judgment against appellees. Appellants filed a complaint in the superior court against appellees and the Skyline Corporation which is not a party to this appeal. The complaint alleged, inter alia, that the defendants made false and fraudulent statements concerning the newness of a trailer which appellants had purchased; that there was a failure of consideration; and a violation by appellee Daman Sales Inc. of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Herman v. SanteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Marsh v. RiskasArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Copper King v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Huff v. FlynnArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fridena v. PalmerArizona Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Duckstein v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API