Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1997No. 2762Published

1Dissent

GOOLSBY,

Judge, dissenting:

The following opinion was originally drafted to serve as the majority opinion. I now submit it as my dissenting opinion.

William R. Harrell brought this negligence action against Pineland Plantation Company (Pineland) seeking to recover damages for injuries caused when Harrell fell while swinging from a rope into a shallow pond on Pineland’s property. The trial court granted Pineland’s motion to dismiss, holding Pine-land was Harrell’s statutory employer and the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction of Harrell’s claim because of the exclusivity provisions of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Hayne Federal Credit Union v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API