Legal Opinion

City of Kingsport, Tenn. v. SCM Corp.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 23, 1976No. Civ. A. 2639PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a removed diversity action, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a)(1), (c), 1441(a), by a municipality (Kingsport) and others for damages emanating from a defective roof placed on a high school building, against the defendants SCM Corporation (SCM) and Special Coatings, Inc. (Coatings). SCM impleaded by counterclaim the defendants-by-counterclaim Steel and Roof Structure, Inc. (Steel), Bristol Pre-Stressed Concrete Corporation (Bristol), and Messrs. J. Larry Poole and William Hamilton Wallace (Poole & Wallace) for indemnity or contribution. Coatings…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bohn Aluminum & Brass Corporation v. Storm King CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  3. Tee-Pak, Inc. v. St. Regis Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Cincinnati v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Region 5Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Olin Corporation v. Yeargin IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Fischbach & Moore International Corp. v. Crane Barge R-14District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
  4. Manning v. Fort Deposit BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1985
  5. Security Fire Protection Co. v. City of RipleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API