Legal Opinion

Salmon for All v. Department of Fisheries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1992No. 57757-9PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Salmon For All, Pierre Marchand, and Les Clark (hereinafter collectively Salmon For All) challenge a trial court's order denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to the Washington State Department of Fisheries. Salmon For All brought action in Thurston County Superior Court alleging the Open Public Meetings Act of 1971 applied to negotiations by the Department of Fisheries with Oregon, federal, and tribal fisheries officials in the development of Columbia River salmon fishing regulations. We affirm the trial court.

Facts

Procedural History

In October 1987, Salmon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Marincovich v. TarabochiaWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cathcart v. AndersenWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States v. OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Lockhart v. GreiveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Klickitat County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Colbert v. PACIFIC STATES MARINE FISHERIES COM'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Colbert v. Pacific States Marine Fisheries CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API