Colbert v. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Sweeney, A.C.J.
— Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes involving federal agencies. But mere consent by Congress to the creation of a multistate commission (consent required by the compact clause of the United States Constitution, article I, section 10) does not mean that the resulting commission is a federal agency. The trial court held in this personal injury suit that, absent an express disclaimer, any commission created by the consent of Congress was a federal agency. We disagree and therefore reverse the court’s summary dismissal of Susan Colbert’s *823damage suit against…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Forest Practices Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005