Mitchell v. City of Springfield
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
COTTEY, Special Judge.
The City of Springfield has by ordinance adopted a policemen’s and firemen’s retirement plan which makes available two types of pensions for members who are retired for disability: 1st, a “non-duty disability” pension, under which one-half the member’s average annual salary is payable to him if his disablement is “not the direct result of occupational duties”; and 2nd, a “duty disability” pension, under which two-thirds of his salary shall be paid him if he is “disabled as the direct result of occupational duties, including but not limited to accidents and/or hazards…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Police Retirement System v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Easley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Green v. Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Moore v. BD. OF ED. OF SP. SCH. DIST., ETC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sall v. EllfeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Saunders v. Reorganized School District No. 2 of Osage CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- City of Columbia v. Missouri State Board of MediationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bergman v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.