Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. City of Springfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1966No. 8577PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COTTEY, Special Judge.

The City of Springfield has by ordinance adopted a policemen’s and firemen’s retirement plan which makes available two types of pensions for members who are retired for disability: 1st, a “non-duty disability” pension, under which one-half the member’s average annual salary is payable to him if his disablement is “not the direct result of occupational duties”; and 2nd, a “duty disability” pension, under which two-thirds of his salary shall be paid him if he is “disabled as the direct result of occupational duties, including but not limited to accidents and/or hazards…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hood v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Police Retirement System v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. Easley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Green v. Terminal RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. BD. OF ED. OF SP. SCH. DIST., ETC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Sall v. EllfeldtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Saunders v. Reorganized School District No. 2 of Osage CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. City of Columbia v. Missouri State Board of MediationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Bergman v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API