Snider v. Rinehart
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County. Action for possession and damages. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
This was an action by Rose Rinehart, plaintiff below, to recover from the defendant Snider possession of certain real estate and damages for its detention. The complaint contains two causes of action; the first, which is all that need be considered on this appeal, is similar to a count in ejectment *19under our former practice. See Code of Civil Procedure, chap. 23.
There were two jury trials of the cause in the district court. The first trial occurred at the November term, 1887, and resulted in favor of the' defendant. Prior to the next ensuing term, March, 1888, the plaintiff paid the costs,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hagelstein v. Swift-Eckrich Division of ConAgraNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. DaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Snider v. RinehartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- Duggan v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.