Legal Opinion

Duggan v. McCullough

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1899No. 3852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

This action, for recovery of the possession of real property, was brought by the plaintiff below (plaintiff in error), as the grantee of the patentee, against the defendant below (defendant in error), the grantee in a tax deed. There have been three trials, the last one to the court without a jury, partly upon an agreed statement of facts, and in part upon oral testimony. The first trial resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff; the other two for the defendant. Unless the tax deed conveys a good title to the defendant, the plaintiff is the owner and entitled to recover.

Judgment went for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCready v. Sexton & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Percifull v. PlattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Barnett v. JaynesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Waddingham v. DicksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  5. Breeze v. HaleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. North v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Citizens' Committee for Fair Property Taxation v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. White Pine Manufacturing Co. v. MoreyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mining v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1906
  5. White Cap Mining Co. v. Resurrection Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API