Patton v. La Bree
California Supreme Court
1DissentPeters, J.
I dissent.
The majority opinion correctly summarizes the allegations of the complaint. It there appears that plaintiff was not only the owner of the car, but was engaged in a business enterprise with the driver. The majority opinion holds that the classification contained in the 1961 amendment to section 17158 of the Vehicle Code between nonowner business occupants or passengers and owner business occupants or passengers has a reasonable basis and, therefore, is constitutional. With that conclusion I disagree. As will be shown, the classification contained in that amendment, as applied to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.