Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 14, 2006No. 05-1989PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) filed a complaint alleging Ronald F. Walker violated numerous rules of the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility for Lawyers (Code). Walker acknowledged if the matter proceeded to evidentiary hearing before the Grievance Commission (Commission), he could not successfully defend against the charges. The parties agreed to submit the matter to the Commission upon a stipulation in lieu of an evidentiary hearing. The Board and Walker stipulated to the facts of the complaint, to certain violations of the Code, and to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. MoormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HohenadelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HonkenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. MoonenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. IversenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Stephen ConroySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TompkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API