Legal Opinion

Shane v. Rhines

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1983No. 5653Published

1Opinion of the Court

672 P.2d 895 (1983)

Robert Lee SHANE, Appellant,

v.

John W. RHINES, Appellee.

No. 5653.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

November 10, 1983.

Kenneth J. Cusack, Rogers & Cusack, Soldotna, for appellant.

Kenneth P. Jacobus and Joseph M. Huddleston, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, for appellee.

Before BURKE, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and SINGLETON, Court of Appeals Judge[*].

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal arises out of an auto accident which occurred on the Kenai Spur Road in October 1978. At trial, Rhines, the defendant below, admitted that he had been drinking prior to the accident…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Freeman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Clary Insurance Agency v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API