Legal Opinion

People v. Fox

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1997No. B104261PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

I

In the published portion of this opinion we determine the trial court properly instructed the jury that, for purposes of Penal Code section 460, the statute defining degrees of burglary, “[wjhere a garage is attached to an inhabited dwelling house and is, therefore, not a separate structure, it is considered to be a part of the inhabited structure.”

In the unpublished portion of this opinion we determine the trial court properly instructed the jury on the principles of aiding and abetting and the reasonable doubt burden of proof. In addition, we conclude the trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. People v. MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. People v. ThornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. DebouverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. (HC) Rodriguez v. LizzaragaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. AUSTIN (JOSEPH) v. STATE (CRIMINAL)Court of Appeals of Nevada · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API