Legal Opinion

Cosandier v. Junod

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1929No. 28,454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The defense was that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs contended the bar was removed by an acknowledgment in writing. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendant appeals.

*525The note was given by Alfred Junod to Philip Cosandier and Paul Cosandier. Paul died and Philip was appointed executor- of his will. The plaintiffs were Philip Cosandier, and Philip Cosandier as executor. The defendant was the maker of the note. Authorized attorneys for plaintiffs wrote a letter to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Pracht v. McNeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Hottell v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Harbaugh v. HerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Wichita Sanitarium v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  5. Updegrove v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API