Cosandier v. Junod
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one to recover on a promissory note. The defense was that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs contended the bar was removed by an acknowledgment in writing. Plaintiffs prevailed, and defendant appeals.
*525The note was given by Alfred Junod to Philip Cosandier and Paul Cosandier. Paul died and Philip was appointed executor- of his will. The plaintiffs were Philip Cosandier, and Philip Cosandier as executor. The defendant was the maker of the note. Authorized attorneys for plaintiffs wrote a letter to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Pracht v. McNeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baker v. ChristySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Hottell v. KempSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Harbaugh v. HerrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Wichita Sanitarium v. BierschbachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Updegrove v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938