Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Hensley

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1961No. Civ. 19150PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. pro tem. *

Respondent Clyde Hensley, president of respondent Hensley Equipment Company, invented an earth-ripping device which attached to the cutting edge of a bulldozer blade by means of a twin shank. He also perfected a similar device which could be used on a dozer blade as a brush rake. The principal feature of the invention is the design and method of attaching the equipment to the lower lip of a bulldozer blade so that no pressure is exerted on the thin breakable edge. Respondents were manufacturing these devices in 1951 when appellant Rogers called at their plant to inquire…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. H. J. Heinz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. National Transformer Corp. v. France Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lear Siegler, Inc., a Corporation v. John S. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Holiday Matinee, Inc. v. Rambus, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Adkins v. Lear, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re Oximetrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Applera Corp. v. MP BIOMEDICALS, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API