Legal Opinion
Holiday Matinee, Inc. v. Rambus, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 2004No. H026142PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
This consumer class action arises out of alleged anticompetitive conduct in connection with patents on certain computer memory chip technology obtained by defendant and respondent, Rambus, Inc. (Rambus). Plaintiff and appellant Holiday Matinee, Inc. (Holiday) alleged three causes of action in its second amended complaint (Complaint): a claim for violation of the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code § 16720 et seq.); a claim for violation of California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.); and a claim for unjust enrichment.
The case is before us as a result…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Prakashpalan v. Engstrom, Lipscomb & LackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- CALIFORNIA LOGISTICS, INC. v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Favila v. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.