Legal Opinion

Green v. Shell Oil Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for damages for injuries suffered while at work which were allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant’s employee. Both plaintiff’s employer and defendant were subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Defendant filed a supplemental answer, contending that plaintiff’s claim came within the joint supervision and control provision of ORS 656.154. Trial before the court was on the supplemental answer and the court found that plaintiff could not recover because defendant, at the time of plaintiff’s injury, was on premises over which *364defendant had joint supervision…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Shoemaker v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gorham v. SwansonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bass v. DUNTHORPE MOTOR TRANSPORT CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Hensler v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Perkins v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Senger v. Risberg's Truck LineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API