Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 19, 1999No. 96-CV-968PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellant was employed at the relevant time by the Department of Human Services (“DHS”). He filed an administrative complaint seeking payment for 21.5 hours of overtime he was scheduled to work but which DHS had cancelled, and for additional overtime for which he would have been eligible except for what he asserted was an unwarranted employment action by DHS. His entitlement to these payments depended upon application of the Federal Back Pay Act (“BPA”).1 Appellant also sought restoration of his opportunity to work future overtime. The Office of Employee Appeals…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- James E. Brown v. Secretary of the Army. Wellington Mitchell v. Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- FLORENTINO RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE APPEALS and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- White v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Mitchell v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999