Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 19, 1999No. 96-CV-968Published
1Opinion of the Court
736 A.2d 228 (1999)
Wesley D. MITCHELL, Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.
No. 96-CV-968.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Submitted February 18, 1999.
Decided August 19, 1999.
Wesley D. Mitchell filed a brief pro se.
Jo Anne Robinson, Interim Corporation Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and Sheila Kaplan, Assistant Corporation Counsel, were on the brief for appellee.
Before STEADMAN and FARRELL, Associate Judges and KERN, Senior Judge.
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellant was employed at the relevant time by the Department of Human…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- John P. Mack v. United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.