Legal Opinion
FLORENTINO RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE APPEALS and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2016No. 15-CV-997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Florentino Rodriguez (“appellant” or the “Employee”) challenges a decision of the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals (“OEA”) that upheld his termination from his position as an Urban Park Ranger with the District of Columbia (“District”) Department of Parks and Recreation after he failed a random drug test. He contends, inter alia, that his termination was improper because, in violation of the applicable collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”), the District’s personnel agency, the District of Columbia Department of Human Resources (“DHR” or the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cornelius v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carolyn Thomas v. Marion BarryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Edward J. Handy v. U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Donna Black v. DC Dept. of Human Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- District of Columbia Dep't of Human Services v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Farmer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- Sium v. Office of State Superintendent of EducationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Youngblood v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021