Legal Opinion
Jay v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 27, 1945No. 3042PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Perry A. Jay, an employee of Midwest Piping and Supply Company, sustained personal injuries in the course of his employment at Geneva, Utah. He elected to take compensation benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state, Utah Code 1943, 42 — 1—1 et seq.; the insurance carrier for Midwest Piping and Supply Company commenced the payment of compensation benefits in accordance with the Act; and the payments were accepted. Jay executed a written instrument in which it was recited that he elected to take the compensation benefits, and that because the injuries…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- J. E. Riley Investment Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Parkhill Truck Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Johanson v. Cudahy Packing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
- Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Ramon Rodriguez Colon, Ramon Rodriguez Colon v. Waterman Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company (Formerly Sunray Oil Corporation) v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- First National Bank in Wichita v. LutherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Bradford v. MoenchDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Magee v. McNanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.