Legal Opinion
Application of Shrewsbury
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 5, 1981No. JC 67,629, CA A20307; JC 63,468, CA A20309PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.
In these two consolidated cases, which were brought as proceedings in habeas corpus, defendants appeal the trial court orders directing removal of the juvenile petitioners from Rosemont School (Rosemont) on the ground that the school is a "private institution operated as a training school for children requiring secure custody” and that, as such, placement by Children’s Services Division (CSD) in that school was not authorized by law. ORS 419.509a).
Defendants assign error to (1) the trial court’s ruling that the petitions sufficiently stated claims for habeas corpus relief; (2) the denial of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bekins v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Newton v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Mueller v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. A.V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. H. B. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. ChapterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. ACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.