Legal Opinion

Fullard v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 31, 2007No. 07-542CPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is plaintiffs pro se complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”) seeking a court-appointed attorney and monetary and injunctive relief. Plaintiff alleges that defendant violated the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1988, 1985(3), 1986 (1988) (the “Civil Rights Act”), by “intentionally, recklessly, willfully and wantonly causing] an unnecessary deployment of the Judicial System with implication [sic] actions that violated the Constitution, and fraud.”1 Compl. 1. He further asserts that defendant deprived him of his rights under the Fifth,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. McGrath v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Mendez-Cardenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Bobka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Merriman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API