In re Nomination Petition of Guzzardi
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Baer
I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Pennsylvania courts may never, under any circumstances, invoke equity, specifically nunc pro tunc principles, to excuse a candidate’s untimely filing of a statement of financial interests with the Ethics Commission because to do so would override the Legislative pronouncement in Section 1104(b)(3) of the Ethics Act that such omission “shall ... be a fatal defect to a petition to appear on the ballot.” 65 Pa.C.S. § 1104(b)(3). Adoption of such a harsh and inflexible rule runs counter to this Court’s pronouncement that the strict disclosure…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Cook v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Criss v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Baranyai v. AndrezjwskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.