Legal Opinion

Baranyai v. Andrezjwski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1993No. 36 and 37 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

NIX, Chief Justice.

In these consolidated appeals we are asked to decide whether the requirements of the Public Official and Employee Ethics Act (“Ethics Act”),1 specifically with respect to the filing of financial interests statements, were complied with by six candidates seeking inclusion on the May, 1991, primary ballot for municipal office.

In the appeal docketed at No. 36 W.D. Appeal Docket 1991, the nomination petitions of Peter W. Zentner, Marilyn J. Stevens and Richard W. Masten, prospective candidates for council seats in the Borough of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ross Nomination PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. James AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Wieskerger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. In Re: Recount of BallotsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Norwood Election Contest CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In Re Nomination Petition of CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In RE NOMINATION OF deYOUNGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Shambach v. BickhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API