Legal Opinion
Tanbro Fabrics Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 14, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacken, J.
The question presented is whether respondent, Tanbro Fabrics Corporation (Tanbro), is required to arbitrate its claim against appellant, Deering Milliken, Inc. (Milliken). Tanbro and defendant, Mill Fabrics Corporation (Mill), are fabric converters. Milliken is a major supplier of textiles.. In 1968 Mill bought 510,000 yards of fabric from Milliken and paid for it." The fabric was to be held for Mill’s account at a mill in South Carolina owned or controlled by Milliken. A year later Tanbro bought from Mill and paid for 260,000 yards, being the balance of the fabric at the South Carolina mill,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Arbitration between Helen Whiting, Inc. & Trojan Textile Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re LowenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Matter of LowenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re: Bdc 56 Llc, Debtor. Key Mechanical Inc. v. Bdc 56 Llc, Dwf Inc., Mesta Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Sea Spray Holdings, Ltd. v. Pali Financial Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Banque De Paris Et Des Pays-Bas v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Menaker v. PadoverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- RRCI Constructors, LLC v. Charlie's/Diamond Ready Mix, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.